brdgt: (Ambitious by foggi)
[personal profile] brdgt
Health Textbooks in Texas to Change Wording About Marriage
The New York Times, November 6, 2004

AUSTIN, Tex., Nov. 5 (AP) - The Texas Board of Education approved new health textbooks for the state's high schools and middle schools on Friday after the publishers agreed to change wordings in the texts to depict marriage strictly as the union of a man and a woman.

The decision involves two of the biggest textbook publishers and is another example of Texas' exerting its market influence as the nation's second-largest buyer of textbooks. Officials say the decision could affect hundreds of thousands of books in Texas alone.

On Thursday, a board member said that proposed new books ran counter to a Texas law banning the recognition of gay civil unions because the texts used terms like "married partners" instead of "husband and wife."

After hearing the debate on Thursday, one publisher, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, agreed to include a definition of marriage as a "lifelong union between a husband and a wife." The definition, which was added to middle school textbooks, was already in Holt's high school editions, Rick Blake, a company spokesman, said.

The other publisher, Glencoe/McGraw-Hill, changed phrases like "when two people marry" and "partners" to "when a man and a woman marry" and "husbands and wives."

"The board expressed an interest in having us" make the change, Mr. Blake said. "We thought it was a reasonable thing to do."

But Mr. Blake said the publisher did not plan to add its definition of marriage in books to be sold outside Texas. A spokeswoman for Glencoe/McGraw-Hill did not immediately respond to questions.

A list of the books that were approved by the board, as well as those that were not, is sent to school districts for guidance when they choose books.

One board member, Mary Helen Berlanga, a Democrat, asked the panel to approve the books without the changes, but her proposal was rejected on a 10-to-4 vote.

"We're not supposed to make changes at somebody's whim," Ms. Berlanga said. "It's a political agenda, and we're not here to follow a political agenda."

Another board member, Terri Leo, a Republican, said she was pleased with the publishers' changes. She had led the effort to get the publishers to change the texts, objecting to what she called "asexual stealth phrases" like "individuals who marry."

"Marriage has been defined in Texas, so it should also be defined in our health textbooks that we use as marriage between a man and a woman," Ms. Leo said.

Texas legislators enacted a law last year that prohibits the state from recognizing same-sex civil unions. The state already had a ban on gay marriage.

Neither publisher made all the changes that Ms. Leo initially sought. For instance, one passage that was proposed to be added to the teacher's editions read: "Opinions vary on why homosexuals, lesbians and bisexuals as a group are more prone to self-destructive behaviors like depression, illegal drug use and suicide."

Randall Ellis, the executive director of the Lesbian/Gay Rights Lobby of Texas, said the board had overstepped its bounds in suggesting and adopting the new wording.

"Their job is to review for factual information and instead what we see is the insertion of someone's ideology and agenda into the textbook of middle schoolers," Mr. Ellis said.

The board's approval caps months of debate over health textbooks. Much of it had centered on how much sex education should be included.

Date: 2004-11-06 10:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mystril.livejournal.com
Le sigh. Why don't they do what my school district did? No health textbooks, so we just learned the teachers' prejudices. And may I just thank God that my creepy ex-military gym teacher only taught me gym and driver's ed and not health.

Date: 2004-11-06 01:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brdgt.livejournal.com
Sex Ed was taught in Home Ec in my school, which was not required for everyone and almost entirely taken by girls - therefore most boys in my school did not receive ANY sex education.

Date: 2004-11-06 10:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] monstermishmisu.livejournal.com
"asexual stealth phrases?" Those darn definitions of words, they'll totally sneak up on you in the night and kill your children! beware the asexual stealth phrases and their catlike will to destroy! Actually, that would be a good band name, I may steal it for my all paramilitary queer core group.

Date: 2004-11-06 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brdgt.livejournal.com
It does sound like a Le Tigre lyric, doesn't it?

Date: 2004-11-06 11:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elf-chick.livejournal.com
I heard that on the news last night. this place sucks.

what does marriage have to do with health anyway? i guess it's just a prelude to the section on fucking.

Date: 2004-11-06 12:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] applehangover.livejournal.com
Haven't you heard? Only married people (man and woman) can make babies! Sex is for procreation ONLY, and only within the confines of marriage. To imply otherwise condones all sorts of immoral and promiscuous behavior! You wouldn't want people to get ideas. :P

Gee whilikers, maybe I should get a health book. I'll need to know what to look forward to on my wedding night. Bwwaaahh-hhaaa-haaa!!!

Date: 2004-11-06 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wyoluvr.livejournal.com
from mediev-l, a medieval history email list for amateur and professional historians, also sent to Holt Rinehart and Winston, by Paul Halsall, the editor of Fordham University's Internet History Sourcebooks Project.

Apparently you are willing to change testbooks in order to appeal to fundamenatlist Christians.

Fair enough - it's your right to publish what you want.

However, if you cave, I will try to iniatiate a campaign among humanities professors to boycott your books on the basis that you give in to pressure from religious fanatics. I run a very big history website, and will promote the boycott there: we simply cannot trust publishers who are so craven.


needs a spellcheck, but bravo.

Date: 2004-11-06 01:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brdgt.livejournal.com
The problem is the Texas textbook market, since it is the largest (along with California, I believe) it dictates the options available to all other states. These publishers deal almost entirely in high school textbooks, so I don't know how much of an effect his boycott would do, but it is the thought that counts.

Date: 2004-11-06 01:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wyoluvr.livejournal.com
yeah. i think it's not the effect of his boycott, but the fact that he is *doing* something, rather than just ranting on a medieval email list. if he got enough people on board, it would at the very least make the publisher pay some attention. it wouldn't change what's happened, but i'm not sure the publisher would really want the publicity.

Profile

brdgt: (Default)
Brdgt

December 2018

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 25th, 2025 02:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios