wow, that last article about alternative fuels was really antagonistic in tone. I do appreciate the irony of pataki trying to get biodiesel in to fuel stations when you can't buy a new diesel car in NY State.

and I am getting so frustrated at all of this 'science reporting' that doesn't actually report facts, but just these guys from the lung association who are relying on really old data that may or may not be true any more. and after that they throw in a bone like "But a variety of research suggests that the fuels can be environmentally beneficial.."? it's so damning to allow the naysayers the use of specific scientific terms and to make the proponents this vague research group without any real information.